In development. A provincial cut of the Groundshare proposal — every number below traces to BC's own published rolls and statistics.
Groundshare · British Columbia

The province where the ground is the wealth.

Nowhere in Canada does location carry more of what property is worth. In Metro Vancouver, roughly three-quarters of all property value is the ground alone — measured parcel by parcel from BC's own rolls, at core, suburb, and exurb alike. BC is where Groundshare's story is strongest, its data is best, and its machinery already half-exists.

$1.87T
BC's residential assessed value alone (Schedule 707, 2025 authenticated roll)
≈ ¾
of Metro Vancouver property value is land — measured from 570,000+ parcels
$372,800
residential assessed value per municipal resident — highest in Canada
22×
spread in per-resident value across BC's 159 municipalities — Whistler to Fraser Lake
Measured from BC's own rolls

Four cities, parcel by parcel.

BC is the only province where we could measure whole cities and audit the measurements. City open-data portals republish BC Assessment's per-parcel land and improvement values; we aggregated every parcel:

national avg ≈53% Surrey 78% Vancouver 75% Langley Twp 74% Victoria 69% % of assessed value that is land (value-weighted; full city rolls, 2026). Single-family zones run higher still: 83–85%.

And we attacked our own numbers: in ~500-metre grid cells across all 101,488 Surrey standard lots, built parcels' land allocations sit within ~11% of what same-sized vacant lots are assessed at. The three-quarters figure isn't an artifact — it's what BC ground is worth. (the audit)

What it means at your address

Who receives, who pays.

Under the national design — every Canadian's equal share, ≈$9,000 a year — the incidence inside BC follows the ground, not the postal code's reputation:

The BC renterreceives in full Four full shares for a renting family of four — ≈$36,100/yr. The average Canadian renting household nets ≈$21,400; BC's renters, facing the country's highest ground costs, are the design's clearest case.
The condo majoritymostly receives Vancouver strata land shares are high (76%) but per-unit land values are modest — most condo households sit below the ≈$456k household crossover and collect.
Median Vancouver detachedpays ≈ $49k/yr ≈$1.45M of land at the measured 85% single-family share. This page says it plainly rather than being told it: the paying class in BC is detached land in the scarcity belt, plus entities.
Hinterland BCstrongly receives Prince George holds $153k of residential value per resident; Fraser Lake $75k. Most of BC's map — as land, not people — is on the receiving side.
The honest ledger

BC pays in. Here's the whole picture.

In aggregate, at the measured land shares, 81 of BC's 159 municipalities — holding 90% of its municipal population — sit above the national break-even line as communities. Under a national pool, BC's scarcity-priced ground funds settlements everywhere. Two things keep that honest rather than fatal:

MunicipalityResidential value / resident
Whistler$1,618,700
West Vancouver$1,337,500
Vancouver$507,400
Surrey$312,600
Victoria$305,400
Kamloops$220,000
Prince George$153,200
Fraser Lake$74,700

Schedule 707, 2025 roll — the full 159-municipality ranking is in the research.

Communities are not households. "Vancouver pays" describes the city's aggregate holdings — landlord, investor, and corporate land included. The renter and the condo owner inside Vancouver still receive individually. And a BC-only pool wouldn't dissolve the tension: the 22× spread means a provincial pool just relocates the same question — Whistler and West Vancouver become the new "Vancouver," Fraser Lake the new "Saskatoon." There is no container without an internal gradient.

For scale: if BC pooled only its own residential ground, the share works out to roughly $260–290k per municipal resident ($372,800 × the measured 69–78% land shares) — a flow of ≈$14–16k/yr at 5.5%, before any commercial or industrial ground is added. Bigger cheques, smaller circle of solidarity — that trade is the container question, and it stays open on the decision desk rather than being settled by this page.

Why BC anyway

Groundshare's machinery was half-built here.

The BC ask, before any settlement: BC Assessment already computes and licenses the full-province per-parcel split — it should publish its annual roll extract as open data. Four of its own municipalities prove the sky doesn't fall. Zero fiscal cost; pure transparency; its own justification with or without Groundshare.
Groundshare in British Columbia — a provincial cut of a proposal in open development. Sources: BC Ministry of Municipal Affairs Schedule 707 (2025 roll); city open-data rolls (Vancouver, Surrey, Victoria, Langley Township, 2026); StatCan-derived national figures per the research library. Aggregate community positions are not household incidence; the difference is stated wherever the numbers appear. Corrections are published, not erased.