In development. A provincial cut of the Groundshare proposal — every number below traces to BC's own published rolls and statistics.
Groundshare · British Columbia
The province where the ground is the wealth.
Nowhere in Canada does location carry more of what property is worth.
In Metro Vancouver, roughly three-quarters of all property value is the ground alone —
measured parcel by parcel from BC's own rolls, at core, suburb, and exurb alike.
BC is where Groundshare's story is strongest, its data is best, and its machinery
already half-exists.
$1.87T
BC's residential assessed value alone (Schedule 707, 2025 authenticated roll)
≈ ¾
of Metro Vancouver property value is land — measured from 570,000+ parcels
$372,800
residential assessed value per municipal resident — highest in Canada
22×
spread in per-resident value across BC's 159 municipalities — Whistler to Fraser Lake
Measured from BC's own rolls
Four cities, parcel by parcel.
BC is the only province where we could measure whole cities and audit the
measurements. City open-data portals republish BC Assessment's per-parcel land and
improvement values; we aggregated every parcel:
And we attacked our own numbers: in ~500-metre
grid cells across all 101,488 Surrey standard lots, built parcels' land allocations sit within
~11% of what same-sized vacant lots are assessed at. The three-quarters figure isn't an
artifact — it's what BC ground is worth. (the audit)
What it means at your address
Who receives, who pays.
Under the national design — every Canadian's equal share, ≈$9,000 a year — the
incidence inside BC follows the ground, not the postal code's reputation:
The BC renterreceives in fullFour full shares for a renting family of four — ≈$36,100/yr. The average
Canadian renting household nets ≈$21,400; BC's renters, facing the country's highest ground
costs, are the design's clearest case.
The condo majoritymostly receivesVancouver strata land shares are high (76%) but per-unit land values are
modest — most condo households sit below the ≈$456k household crossover and collect.
Median Vancouver detachedpays ≈ $49k/yr≈$1.45M of land at the measured 85% single-family share. This page says it
plainly rather than being told it: the paying class in BC is detached land in the scarcity belt,
plus entities.
Hinterland BCstrongly receivesPrince George holds $153k of residential value per resident; Fraser Lake $75k.
Most of BC's map — as land, not people — is on the receiving side.
The honest ledger
BC pays in. Here's the whole picture.
In aggregate, at the measured land shares, 81 of BC's 159 municipalities —
holding 90% of its municipal population — sit above the national break-even line as
communities. Under a national pool, BC's scarcity-priced ground funds settlements
everywhere. Two things keep that honest rather than fatal:
Municipality
Residential value / resident
Whistler
$1,618,700
West Vancouver
$1,337,500
Vancouver
$507,400
Surrey
$312,600
Victoria
$305,400
Kamloops
$220,000
Prince George
$153,200
Fraser Lake
$74,700
Schedule 707, 2025 roll — the full 159-municipality ranking is in
the research.
Communities are not households. "Vancouver pays" describes
the city's aggregate holdings — landlord, investor, and corporate land included. The renter and
the condo owner inside Vancouver still receive individually. And a BC-only pool wouldn't dissolve
the tension: the 22× spread means a provincial pool just relocates the same question — Whistler
and West Vancouver become the new "Vancouver," Fraser Lake the new "Saskatoon." There is no
container without an internal gradient.
For scale: if BC pooled only its own residential ground,
the share works out to roughly $260–290k per municipal resident
($372,800 × the measured 69–78% land shares) — a flow of ≈$14–16k/yr at 5.5%, before any
commercial or industrial ground is added. Bigger cheques, smaller circle of solidarity — that
trade is the container question, and it stays
open on the decision desk rather than being settled by this page.
Why BC anyway
Groundshare's machinery was half-built here.
BC publishes the number that matters. The only province where per-parcel land values
sit on notices and in open city datasets — Vancouver, Surrey, Victoria, and Langley Township
republish whole rolls. That transparency is why this page can exist.
Deferral was invented here. BC has let seniors defer property taxes against their
home since 1974 — the exact machinery that answers "what about grandma" is boring, tested
BC administration.
BC already ran the natural experiments. The Speculation and Vacancy Tax and
Vancouver's Empty Homes Tax are working land-holding charges with published evaluations —
including vacant units converting to rental housing, the behavioural response Groundshare's
no-distortion argument predicts.
The audit ran on BC data and passed. When we tested whether assessed land values
track real vacant-land prices, BC's own rolls supplied the test — and cleared it.
The BC ask, before any settlement:
BC Assessment already computes and licenses the full-province per-parcel split — it should
publish its annual roll extract as open data. Four of its own municipalities prove the sky
doesn't fall. Zero fiscal cost; pure transparency; its own justification with or without
Groundshare.
Groundshare in British Columbia — a provincial cut of a proposal in open development.
Sources: BC Ministry of Municipal Affairs Schedule 707 (2025 roll); city open-data rolls
(Vancouver, Surrey, Victoria, Langley Township, 2026); StatCan-derived national figures per
the research library. Aggregate community positions are not
household incidence; the difference is stated wherever the numbers appear. Corrections are
published, not erased.